Flow of Ideas: articles - When Bullies Roam the School |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| When Bullies Roam the SchoolGlenn Rikowski, 3rd November 2007, London Introduction Shortly before Gordon Brown became Prime Minister the National Society for the Protection of Children (NSPCC) published a report indicating the extent of bullying in schools in the UK. The study surveyed 609 boys and 554 girls in 23 schools during February – April 2007. The NSPCC study reported that: “Some 42% of children have been kicked, punched or hit at school … [and] … just under 10% of pupils said that the attack involved a weapon or other object at school and 22% admitted they go to school worried that they might be subjected to a similar violent attack while there …” (Andalo, 2007, p.1). Brown et al (2007) provided evidence which shows that bullying is particularly rife in the UK as compared with the Netherlands, Italy and Iceland [1]. However, a recent study (reported in Asthana, 2007; and Gill, 2007a) by Tim Gill [2] argues that the concept of ‘bullying’ has been inflated beyond its original meaning. Furthermore, Gill (2007a) has stated that what were once seen as mere squabbles are now sometimes viewed as ‘bullying’. Has the concept of ‘bullying’ in school life lost its meaning? Bullying as a Problem for Schools The general outlook on bullying in the press is that it is undesirable, is a growing problem and that the government, school inspectors, local education authorities (LEAs) and schools should do something about. Tragic and disturbing cases such as Nathan Jones (a 12-year old boy who was found hanged in the bathroom of his house in Romford) who was apparently bullied by pupils at the school he attended (Smith, 2005), seem increasingly common. The phenomenon known as “happy slapping”, where ‘pupils gang up on a victim, assault them and use their mobile telephones to video the attack’, is on the increase according to Shaw (2005). Celebrity agony aunts such as Mariella Frostrup have tackled the scourge of bullying in schools. Frostrup recently gave advice to a 25-year-old woman who claimed that being bullied by boys at school for being ‘geeky’ left her unable to have significant relationships with men, and that she could only relate to them when drunk (in Frostrup, 2007). Basically, Frostrup urges the ‘unattractive freak and misfit’ (a self-description) to get a grip, noting that: “School is not just a citadel of learning, it’s a battlefield. As such it provides even better preparation for life than it advertises” (Ibid.). For Frostrup, bullying in schools merely reflects the conflictual nature of social relationships in the wider society. Certainly a number of education researchers (e.g. Coldron et al, 2002; and Munn, 1999) have noted that bullying is being taken seriously by schools in recent years. Duncan (2006) provides shocking evidence on the homophobic bullying in schools, where labelling someone as ‘gay’ becomes a general term of abuse ‘to denote boys who did not possess enough of the qualities that fitted the ideal male stereotype of the dominant peer group’ (p.1). Research by Colborn et al (2002) highlights the extent to which schoolchildren yearn for a school that is a ‘safe social, emotional and educational space’ (p.3). Definitional excess? However, the model of schools as havens of harmony and co-operation amongst pupils raises the question of the definition of bullying. Munn (1999) notes the lack of consensus regarding what constitutes ‘bullying’ in schools (p.117). She notes how it can take many forms – physical aggression, threats, intimidation, extortion, rejection, name calling and teasing (Ibid.) – but stresses that it must involve repetition, intentionality and unequal power relationships (Ibid.). Thus: “In essence the behaviour has to take place more than once; the intention is to intimidate, threaten or exclude; and the bully or bullies are more powerful in terms of age, physique or numbers” (Ibid.). Yet Gill (2007a) holds that the concept has been used way beyond Munn’s definition in the context of schools. He argues: “Of course bullying is a problem, and it needs to be tackled effectively. But an essential part of this difficult job is distinguishing between bullying on the one hand and minor skirmishes and arguments among children on the other” (Ibid.). For Gill, the ‘bullying industry’ – the army of researchers, consultants and media education pundits – have not taken enough care in making this distinction. Consequently, parents and teachers are wrapping up kids in ‘cotton wool’ and increasingly constraining their behaviour; which might not be good for their social and emotional development. Cristina Odone (2005) took this point up a couple of years ago, arguing that as teachers and parents are over-protective towards today’s children then their coping skills are not developed sufficiently. Thus: “Our failure means teenagers are ill-equipped to cope with what lies ahead. The slightest bump, and they fall off track” (Ibid.). A recent study from the Royal Society for the Arts (reported in Bloom, 2007) demonstrated how children benefit from coping with hazards and reasonable risk, including disputes with other children. Gill (200b) argued that mild teasing helps children to become more resilient and able to face difficulties thrown up by modern life. Children should be left alone to sort out relationships unless there is a power imbalance that results in cruelty. Furedi (2001) meanwhile, stresses what he calls the ‘culture of emotionalism’ that surrounds such issues as bullying and stress. Conclusion Whilst Tim Gill has stressed that he does not argue that bullying is desirable (in Bloom, 2007), he does believe that levels of playground bullying have been exaggerated and that minor conflicts between children can make for stronger personalities. However, Gill does argue that where sustained victimisation of kids by others involving power imbalances occurs, then interventions – of teachers, parents and other professionals – is justified. The difficult bit is to be sure when and where the line has been crossed. Notes [1] Slide 5 of a PowerPoint presentation produced by Caroline Brown, Alicia Doyle, Kay Lilley and Sophia Peel on 30th October in the School of Education at the University of Northampton (as Brown et al, 2007). [2] See Gill (2007b). References Andalo, D. (2007) Survey shows bullying rife in schools, The Guardian, 21st May, at: http://education.guardian.co.uk/pupilbehaviour/story/0,,2084830,00.html Asthana, A. (2007) Bullying is exaggerated, says childhood expert, The Observer, 28th October, pp.1-2. Coldron, J., Coldwell, M., Logie, A., Povery, H. Radice, M. & Stephenson, K. (2002) “We just talk things through and then she helps me …”: Relationships of trust and mediation, Paper presented at the Annual Conference ofthe British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, 12-14 September, online at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002412.htm Bloom, A. (2007) Take risks, live longer, Times Educational Supplement, 2nd November, p.11. Brown, C., Doyle, A., Lilley, K. & Peel, S. (2007) Why Children Should Start School at Four, PowerPoint presentation for EDU1012 - Introduction to Educational Settings and their Social Contexts, School of Education, University of Northampton, 30th October. Duncan, N. (2006) Homophobia, misogyny and school bullying, Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, 6-9 September, at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/160301.htm Frostrup, M. (2005) Dear Mariella: At 25, she can’t put the bullying endured in the playground behind her, The Observer Magazine, 8th May,p.45. Furedi, F, (2001) Britain’s Therapeutic Culture, The Wall Street Journal Europe, 28th April, p.8. Gill, T. (2007a) Cotton wool revolution, The Guardian, 30th October, p.30. Gill, T. (2007b) No Fear: Growing Up in a Risk-averse Society, London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Munn, P. (1999) The ‘Darker’ Side of Pupil-Culture: Discipline and Bullying in Schools, in: J. Prosser (ed.) School Culture, London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Odone, C. (2005) ‘We have created a culture that fails to teach our children about coping’, The Observer, 27th February, p.25. Shaw, M (2005) Bullies film fights by phone, Times Educational Supplement, 21st January, p.3. Smith, L. (2005) Schoolboy ‘hanged himself after bullying’, The Guardian, 16th April, p.6. Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||