Flow of Ideas: articles - The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| The Business of Becoming a Business for AcademiesGlenn Rikowski, London, 7th October 2005 In a recent article in The Times, Will Pavia and Jon Surtees (2005) reported that: “Tony Blair’s flagship academies programme is at risk of failing to fulfil one of it core aims because of a “tax trap” that will cost individual schools millions of pounds in VAT. The schools, part-funded and managed by business, faith or voluntary groups, were supposed to revitalise deprived areas by bringing new amenities and adult learning to the community, but as ten academies opened this month, taking the total to 27, and with 200 planned by 2010, principals at the schools told The Times that they faced financial disaster because of a government oversight. If an academy were to make its gym, hall or swimming pool available to local people – as promised in its founding charter – it would face a VAT bill of millions.” What the account of Pavia and Surtees hints at is that academies are being restricted in charging for their services, such as the hire of rooms or use of facilities. It also seems from the report that the Department for Education and Skills always viewed that the academies would be able to recoup some of the vast sums spent on them [1] by charging for services. Yet there was a flaw in this scheme. New Labour and the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) did not want to post this up front as it might raise suspicions about what the academies programme was all about. It was supposed to be about raising education standards in areas of disadvantage and where schools were seen to be failing by the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) [2]. Academies were also supposed to be a community resource. Yet if they were charging enough for the hire of services and facilities to generate surpluses then there was the problem of how this might be squared with this remit. It could be surmised that the real agenda was for the schools to suck in those who could pay enough for the hire of services and facilities in order to create these profits: the middle strata of society, not those deemed to be working class. If this agenda became clear then it might raise questions about the future clientele for the academies: children of the middle strata would gradually move in and then sufficient charges for services could be made, perhaps eventually moving towards “co-payment” with fees being levied. Thus, these schools and the services they offer might not be for the poor and disadvantaged – who could not pay enough. The strategy of recouping money back for hire of services and facilities had another problem to overcome: VAT (Valued Added Tax). New Labour and the Department for Education and Skills insisted that the academies were ‘independent institutions’ (i.e. not subject to the control of the Local Education Authority – LEA) (PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 2005, p.7). Furthermore, some of them were controlled by business sponsors. The obsession with academies being viewed as ‘independent’ seemed to set them up as ‘businesses’ under European Union tax law, and hence they were liable for VAT when they charged for services and facilities. Phillipa Booth (2005) has recently been through the debate about whether academies are businesses. She noted government reluctance to debate the issue. Whether academies were businesses and hence liable for VAT also surfaced in Parliament where New Labour Ministers were slow to reply to questions on the issue (see Hansard 2005a and 2005b). The UK Treasury had managed to clinch a deal with the European Union for the building of the academies. The construction costs were given “zero rating” for VAT purposes (Pavia and Surtees, 2005). However: “The waiver only applies as long as 90 percent of the usage of the new buildings is for “relevant charitable purposes”, a regulation intended to stop commercial enterprises posing as charities” (Ibid.). It could be argued that what was as stake was the academies operating as commercial enterprises themselves. This was the real issue; not outside companies cloaked as charities using academies for business purposes. The Department for Education and Skills and the UK Treasury were all for the academies making money out of their services and the UK Treasury sought to change the EU VAT rule, but failed (Ibid.). Having not succeeded in changing the rules of the game the UK Treasury advocated ‘academies dodge the regulations by opening up for free’ (Pavia and Surtees, 2005). The problem with this was the DfES would not wear it. First, academies would not be generating the sorts of sums the DfES had hoped for in setting the original charter and contracts in place. Second: “Neither the DfES nor the schools have budgeted for large VAT bills” (Ibid.). There is no money for the DfES to bail out the academies on VAT, and inter-departmental strife over the issue seems set to continue unless a new UK/EU deal can be fixed. The whole fiasco seems to have emerged out of New Labour’s strategy of attempting to hoodwink the general public over the academies’ status as businesses. One of the aims of this strategy is to habituate teachers, parents and children into working with businesses in school life, as sponsors and ‘partners’ and eventually as profit-makers from educational services (Rikowski, 2005). There is a need in the DfES to get people in schools used to working with businesses before a more substantial and faster programme for the business takeover of schools can proceed. Business folk need to be viewed as saviours, experts and as cuddly and smiley simultaneously: revered and loved. There is no guarantee this strategy will work, and a softly-softly approach is being pursued by New Labour and the DfES, with parents groups (rather than trade unions) being viewed as the main source of resistance, to date. For companies with fingers in the pie of state revenue for schools the strategy is complex and long-winded (see Rikowski, 2005). The UK Treasury’s line on the affair reveals the real vision that New Labour and the DfES has on academies. According to Pavia and Surtees (2005), a Treasury spokesman said: “The 10 percent business limit does not prevent academies from these activities [i.e. charging for services] – it just limits the extent to which they can do this while still remaining eligible for VAT relief.” This limitation has to be smashed – somehow – in order that academies can go to play their groundbreaking and historic role of habituating people to working with businesses in order to realise the real goal of business enterprises' involvement in state schools: profit filtered out of state revenue. Notes [1] £5 billion according to Mansell, Luck and Paton (2005) in today’s Times Educational Supplement. The Business Academy in Bexley alone cost £31 million to build (Pavia and Surtees, 2005). [2] The outfit that runs the schools’ inspection regime – for non-UK readers. References Booth, P. (2005) VAT: Business & Non-Business, The Buzzacott Charity Tax Team, Buzzacott, 12 New Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1AG. Hansard (2005a) Part 1: Written Questions for Answer on Tuesday 1 February 2005, House of Commons, Session 2004-05, The Question Book, at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmordbk1/50201w01.htm Hansard (2005b) Written Answers to Questions, Tuesday 1 February 2005 – Treasury, House of Commons, 1 Feb 2005: Column 759W [Long URL: but see the following: http://www.publications.parliament.uk]. Mansell, W., Luck, A. & Paton, G. (2005) Ministers ‘misled’ public on academies, Times Educational Supplement, 7th October, p.1. Pavia, W. & Surtees, J. (2005) Academies facing £7m VAT trap, The Times, 3rd October, p.16. PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2005) Academies Evaluation, 2nd Annual Report, Department for Education and Skills, Nottingham: DfES Publications. Rikowski, G. (2005) Silence on the Wolves: What is Absent in New Labour’s Five Year Strategy for Education, May, Occasional Paper, Education Research Centre, University of Brighton. Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||