Flow of Ideas: articles - Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education PolicyGlenn Rikowski, London, 27th April 2008 Introduction It has been some time since I wrote anything on postmodernism and education. This may be the last time. Certainly (if one can be certain in the light of postmodern thinking), postmodernism in educational writing appears to have declined in terms of its impact in recent years. What moved me to write this article was how postmodernism seems to be at a loss regarding our understanding of neoliberalism in education policy today. Before I move on to this issue the opening sections outline neoliberalism and some of its consequences for education policy. Neoliberalism … Neoliberalism is the dominant organising ideology for global capital today. As Ross and Gibson (2007) indicate: “Neoliberalism is the prevailing political economic paradigm in the world today and has been described as an ideological “monoculture,” in that when neoliberal policies are criticized a common response is that “there is no alternative” (aka TINA)” (p.2). Thus: it appears to be a juggernaut that invalidates alternative perspectives regarding the organisation of socio-economic social life. In leading capitalist nations, the main political parties tend to converge on its efficacy for running economic and social affairs, and: “Neoliberalism is embraced by parties across the political spectrum … in that the interests of wealthy investors and large corporations define social and economic policy. The free market, private enterprise, consumer choice, entrepreneurial initiative, deleterious effects of government regulations, and so on, are the tenets of neoliberalism” (Ibid.). Martinez and Garcia outline neoliberalism as: the rule of the market; cutting public expenditure for social services (such as education and health care); deregulation (reduction of government regulation that might hit profits); privatization; and the elimination of the concept of “the public good” or “community” – and replacing it with “individual responsibility”, forcing people to find individual solutions in education, health care etc. (2000, cited in Ross and Gibson, 2007, p.3). … and Education According to Tabb (2001) there are “three main elements involved in the neoliberal model of education” (p.1): making the provision of education more cost-efficient by commodifying the product; testing performance by standardising the experience in a way that allows for multiple-choice testing of results; and focusing on marketable skills (i.e., human capital). For Tabb: “The three elements are combined in different policies – cutbacks in the public sector, closing “inefficient” programs that don’t directly meet business needs for a trained workforce, and the use of computers and distance learning, in which courses and degrees are packaged for delivery over the Internet by for-profit corporations” (2001, p.2). These policies indicate that neoliberalism in the field of education is not just a fancy pro-capitalist ideology. It has material consequences for education. Thus: “Neoliberalism is not just a market ideology. It is a real social process, a particular response to the capitalist crises of the 1970s … The basic point is that neoliberalism, as I understand it, in general and when applied to the schools system in England, is about the development of capital, as well as markets: which takes us into the realm of the commodity and commodification – with value, surplus value and profit in tow. Neoliberalism nurtures the development of capital and seeks to crash down any barriers to capital accumulation” (Rikowski, 2006, p.5). Once this is acknowledged, then the penetration of neoliberalism into education policy needs to be understood as an aspect of capital accumulation. This in turn involves exploring capitalist education through concepts central to capital’s functioning: value, surplus-value, profit, labour, labour-power, the commodity and other ‘structuring’ concepts pertinent to understanding the nature of capitalist society and education. This enables us to explain neoliberalism in education and educational reform. Whilst postmodernists are clearly involved in critique of (neoliberal) education, they are less concerned with explanation of neoliberal trends in education. This becomes clear when the ideas of Elizabeth Atkinson, the UK’s leading postmodern thinker in education, are explored. Postmodern Dereliction Atkinson views postmodernism as: resistance toward certainty and resolution; rejection of fixed notions of reality, knowledge, or method; acceptance of complexity, of lack of clarity, and of multiplicity; acknowledgement of subjectivity, contradiction and irony; irreverence for traditions of philosophy or morality; deliberate intent to unsettle assumptions and presuppositions; refusal to accept boundaries or hierarchies in ways of thinking; and disruption of binaries that define things as either/or (in Atkinson and Cole, 2007, p.123). This perspective on social life makes explanation problematic, especially given the first two aspects. It seems all we are left with is a multiplicity of perspectives that fall short of a theory, i.e. an explanation of any particular social phenomenon. Indeed, I have argued in Cole et al (2001) that “… they [postmodernists] are just not interested in explanation!” (p.39). Refusal to explain something as crucial to an understanding of educational reform today as neoliberalism constitutes dereliction of responsibility. This dereliction makes an anti-capitalist politics of education impossible. In a dialogue with Mike Cole (in Atkinson and Cole, 2007), Elizabeth Atkinson takes Cole to task in arguing: “You say it’s important to theorize the world because we need to provide a way of understanding it; postmodernism doesn’t provide a way of understanding the world, it provides ways of looking and seeing and interpreting and constructing, not an answer to a problem” (Atkinson in Atkinson and Cole, 2007, pp.123-124). Thus, on Atkinson’s account, postmodernism is only concerned with providing a range of alternatives, perspectives or possibilities for understanding social phenomena. It has no conception of one explanation being better than another; hence, no real grasp that political action in education and other areas should be based on the most powerful explanation of what is going on there. This is made clear when Atkinson states: “I’m saying that we need to look at a range of alternative possibilities, not to weigh them up, but to see how complex the reality of these things is; how very complex the intersections of different discourses in any situation can be, and what we can make of those intersections” (Atkinson in Atkinson and Cole, 2007, p.124). But weighing up and assessing perspectives and explanations (theories) of educational and related phenomena, and contemporary and historical experiences in the class struggle in education, is central for a viable politics of education. If this is given up to musings about possibilities then strategic thinking in educational and social transformation goes out of the window. All we are left with is endless question posing, for: “… postmodernism is not trying to provide you with an answer as to why society is at it is. It is trying to ask more questions … It is asking the questions, it is not being so sure, that makes a difference” (Atkinson in Atkinson and Cole, 2007, p.124). A ‘programme’ for educational and social transformation based on ‘not being sure’ is unlikely to get many takers, I would wager. People would be right to demand more; to ask for an analysis of neoliberalism in education, for example. This analysis would need to delve deep into the core of capitalist society. In light of this, postmodern dereliction is not good enough. References Atkinson, E. & Cole, M. (2007) Indecision, Social Justice, and Social Change: A Dialogue on Marxism, Postmodernism, and Education, in: A. Green, G. Rikowski & H. Raduntz (Eds.) Renewing Dialogues in Marxism and Education – Openings, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Cole, M., Hill, D., Rikowski, G. & McLaren, P. (2001) Red Chalk: On Schooling, Capitalism & Politics, Brighton: The Institute for Education Policy Studies. Martinez, E. & Garcia, A. (2000) What is neoliberalism? A Brief Definition, updated 26th February, online at: http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/econ101/neoliberalDefined.html Rikowski, G. (2006) Caught in the Storm of Capital: Teacher Professionalism, Managerialism and Neoliberalism in Schools, a paper prepared for Education, Culture & Society (EDU3004) Students, School of Education, University of Northampton, 30th October: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=Caught%20in%20the%20Storm%20of%20Capital Ross, E. Wayne & Gibson, R. (2007) Introduction, to: E. Wayne Ross & R. Gibson(Eds.) Neoliberalism and Education Reform, Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press. Tabb, W. (2001) Globalization and Education as a Commodity, Clarion (summer), at: http://www.psc-cuny-org/jcglobalization.htm Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||