Flow of Ideas: articles - On Education for Its Own Sake |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| On Education for Its Own SakeGlenn Rikowski, London, 17th October 2005 In the Times Educational Supplement of 7th October 2005, Jill Parkin wrote a very timely and hard-hitting critique of New Labour's Academies programme. This was especially significant in the light of Mansell et al's (2005) front page report on academies in the same issue of the TES. Their report indicated that: "Not one of the 28 schools replaced by academies was in special measures at the time of closure, despite ministers' insistence that the £5 billion academies scheme is tackling educational failure." Schools Minister Jacqui Smith had indicated in the summer that academies were making good progress as they had replaced 'failing schools', noted Mansell et al. Not so, apparently; none of the schools were technically or officially failing (i.e. in special measures as stipulated by the Office for Standards in Education) when they were converted to academies (Ibid.). Only two of the schools had ‘serious weaknesses’ when they were moved down the academies road. Thus, with reports like this headlining and front paging the Times Educational Supplement then Jill Parkin's analysis comes along at as strategically embarrassing moment. As Parkin (2005) noted: "Behind it [the Academy programme] there's an assumption about "the masses" that steps right out of the 19th century - that work and profits are all." Furthermore, Parkin has an alternative to this dismal educational philosophy: 'education for its own sake'. This is education for the sheer love of doing it. Notes Parkin: "Of course, if we work and have family responsibilities, we are all cogs in a wheel, but we are also much more. Flawed as they were, both grammars and comprehensives [types of secondary schools for non-UK readers] recognised that the masses in the mill towns, the pit villages and the docks could dream, think and appreciate. Education for its own sake is easily sneered at, but it gives some of the keenest enjoyment mankind knows." Now, advocating 'education for its own sake' as an alternative to 'education for work and profits' does have its appeal. It poses real education against capitalised and commercialised education for the money fetish. It sounds more wholesome, worthwhile and human even. However, in posing 'education for its own sake' as an education ideal we are likely to let the developing forms of capitalist education and training off the hook. What we need is more analysis of capitalist education and training in order to see the nature of the beast we are up against. I have spent the last 25 years developing such an analysis, and whilst I would gladly rally round the flag of 'education for its own sake' against the anti-educational perspective of 'education for work and profits', I would not join up to this cause as an alternative to the analysis and critique of capitalist education and training. I would not put speaking out for 'education for its own sake' as a higher priority than the analysis and critique of capitalist education and training. Education for Its Own Sake The problems with arguing for ‘education for its own sake’ are varied. First, in these hard-nosed days of key skills, the hydra-headed phenomenon of the vocationalisation of all known subjects and topics and the increasingly assessment- and outcomes-based approach to learning it is hard to see how an effete and airy 'education for its own sake' can begin to turn the tide without some massive social movement to stoke its fires. Those such as Parkin will cheerily sing its praises but offer little in the way of how a commitment to such learning might be generated and enhanced. Secondly, in higher education and by stealth in the schools’ system in England, the twin spectres of money and debt loom ever larger. Higher education fees have concentrated the minds of some students so that they choose more vocational degrees partly in order to maximise their chances of paying off debts. This fits in with the vocationalist agenda for a 'mass' higher education system very smoothly. Those students from affluent backgrounds can more readily make higher education choices where their love of particular subjects is not overshadowed by their need to pay off debt after they have got their first degree. Thirdly, as Mary Evans (2004) makes clear, in the UK higher education system the culture of audit, outcomes-based learning and targets is 'killing thinking' in numerous ways. Compliance to government and employers' agendas for debt-ridden students but increasingly for fear-ridden staff is what is occurring on an expanding scale. Of course, there are still occasional outbursts of principled action by the likes of the George Fox 6; where six courageous students at the University of Lancaster peacefully protested about the commercialisation of the university (which included messing with arms dealers and GM crops companies - see Indymedia UK, 2005; and Blair, 2005). But defending 'education for its own sake' against predatory capital (which sometimes flaunts its profit drives over human betterment), given the huge raft of laws now available to the British state, becomes ever more perilous for individuals and groups [1]. The culture of higher education in Britain today is a most unhealthy social and educational environment in which 'education for its own sake' can take root and flourish. Fourthly, it is hard to think of a time in the history of the world when 'education for its own sake' has actually existed. The social form of education is always conditioned by the nature of the society in which it exists. Perhaps for some individuals, or for some groups of researchers or academics, teaching and learning may have existed relatively independently of broader social forces. However, as a general principle underpinning the operation of whole educational systems or even whole institutions or departments the existence of 'education for education's sake' is shadowy indeed. This last point raises the question of whether there can be a kind of ‘island pedagogy’. This is where ‘education for its own sake’ can flourish in particular places within the educational system in England. An 'island' of 'real education' may be possible within a sea of commercialisation, capitalisation, labour-power production, profit-making and mongering, fear of debt and fear of non-conformity and market failure (i.e. not enough students bringing in the flow of money). Island Pedagogy? Island Pedagogy is the notion that strong-willed individuals can buck the trends noted above and 'get back to where we once belonged' with 'education for its own sake'. This is basically the position taken by Frank Furedi (2004) in his book, Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Confronting 21st Century Philistinism. For Furedi, the problem is largely one of a lack of will, gutlessness amongst so-called intellectuals, especially those within academic life, today. Furedi ends his book by noting: "There is very little that we can do to force the elites to give up their instrumentalist and philistine world view. But we can wage a battle of ideas for the hearts and minds of the public. How we do it is one of the key questions of our time" (p.156). Yet Furedi provides no real answer to this question. How can 'education for its own sake' be made to win through against the tide of instrumentalism? Furedi is a sociologist, and to my mind he takes a very unsociological view in clinging to the possibilities for Island Pedagogy in the face of the growing capitalisation of education, especially higher education, where he operates. He avoids analysing the trends that drive independent thought and existence in academic life off the face of the educational landscape at worst, or underground (through marginalisation) at best. Furedi fails to tackle on the monster that threatens his idyll: the virus of capital invading all areas of educational and social life. Island Pedagogy appears to be wishful thinking on a massive scale. The forces of capital are gaining strength in education, in all sectors. Thus, it would seem to me that the place to start, and here is a real job for intellectuals, is the relentless critique of capitalist education and training. Critique of Capitalist Education and Training In my view, we take our eye off the ball if we conjure up some tranquil scenes where worthy souls can engage in Pure Education unsullied by the drives of capital. There is no Island of Real Education. Similarly, bleating about 'education for its own sake' is a comforting diversion when the wolves of capital are tearing the educational landscape apart. It takes bottle to banish such dreams, and on this score Furedi is right to point to mainstream, careerist academics who blunder into the arms of capital whilst schizoid-like holding onto their Educational Ideals. Yet Furedi ultimately is also in this dreamlike state, holding out 'education for its own sake' as a panacea and Island Pedagogy as a strategy in these troubled educational times. Critique must become the sword with which we slay illusions in education today. It is illusions in our leaders, our systems of education, our ideas about these systems and our capacity to hope from something better from them that betray us. Critique must become the first moment in an anti-capitalist educational outlook (see Rikowski, 2004). In the current state of the anti-capitalist movement, only on the back of critique can our dreams ultimately take on real significance and power. Notes: [1] See George Monbiot (2005) on the draconian laws now available to the British state that makes effective protest technically impossible. There is always some law or other to stop it if the police or government so wish to dredge it up. References Blair, A. (2005) Students face jail over protest, The Times, 26th September, p.10. Evans, M. (2004) Killing Thinking: The Death of the Universities, London: Continuum. Furedi, F. (2004) Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Confronting 21st Century Philistinism, London: Continuum. Indymedia UK (2005) George Fox Six on Trial from 26th September, at: http://www4.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/09/323778.html Mansell, W., Luck, A. & Paton, G. (2005) Ministers ‘misled’ public on academies, Times Educational Supplement, 7th October, p.1. Monbiot, G. (2005) Protest is criminalised and the huffers and puffers say nothing, The Guardian, 4th October, p.27. Parkin, J. (2005) Academies' glitter may be fool's gold, Times Educational Supplement, 7th October, p.22. Rikowski, G. (2004) Marx and the Education of the Future, Policy Futures in Education, Vol.2 Nos. 3 & 4, pp.565-577. Available online: http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/viewpdf.asp?j=pfie&vol=2&issue=3&year=2004&article=10_Rikowski_PFEO_2_3-4_web&id=195.93.21.68 Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||