Flow of Ideas: articles - Notes on the Confessions of John Denham |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Notes on the Confessions of John DenhamGlenn Rikowski, London, 26th August 2008 Introduction John Denham is the UK Secretary for Innovation, Universities and Skills. He is charged with ensuring that the government’s commitment to get 50% of young people into higher education (HE) is realised. He is still some way off, with HE participation rates stuck in the lower 40% range, though young women are doing better than young males for HE entry at 45% (Denham, 2008a, p.1). However, the 50% HE participation rate for young people has to be balanced against the 40% target rate for a national workforce with higher level skills and another target of 20 per cent of young people going into apprenticeships. Aiming for these targets in the context of a ‘credit crunch’, rising unemployment, tumbling house prices, high fuel and energy prices, increasing inflation, a plummeting pound and zero growth in the second quarter of 2008 (Strauss, 2008) is the background to a recent ‘confession’ of John Denham: that perhaps ‘some young people would be better off not going to university’ (Turner, 2008). Widening ‘Widening’ Participation? Until recently Denham appeared to be ultra-keen on widening participation. Traditionally, ‘widening participation’ has been viewed as trying to get ‘hard to reach’ groups into HE (e.g. working class and disadvantaged students). However, Denham cast the net much wider, arguing that ‘widening participation’ must be seen to relate to the sons and daughters of skilled workers. Indeed, Denham defined widening participation last April in a speech to the Higher Education Funding council for England (HEFCE) as a ‘majority issue’, relating as much to the offspring of ‘hotel managers, skilled tradesmen, the self-employed, the driving instructors, the class room assistants, the domestic engineers’ (Denham, 2008a, p.2), as those from ‘dysfunctional or at least non traditional family structures’ (Ibid.). He backed this up by expounding on the ‘University Challenge’ that he established last March – to have 20 new HE institutions providing up to 10,000 new places – aiming to fill geographical gaps in the HE system (Ibid.). A few days after his HEFCE speech, Denham talked about a scheme to bring in 30,000 new students who were in work and would study part-time degrees sponsored, partly funded and designed by employers (Wintour, 2008, p.1). He appeared to be backing up his words on widening participation with policies designed to address the issue, albeit to the main advantage of representatives of capital and business interests. Increases in future HE numbers would mostly be based on funding ‘business-focused degrees’ (Denham, 2008a, p.2). Yet only a few days after his HEFCE speech Denham stated the following: “First, of course, we do not promote higher education as the only option for young people. I’ve been very public in my support for expanding apprenticeships, and in making the promise that all young people – not just those who go to university – can be funded to continue their studies until they reach 25 or achieve a level 3 qualification. And it is true that some young people would have been better advised not to go to university. But none of this undermines the importance of higher education expansion or of Labour’s 50 per cent target” (Denham, 2008b, p.1 – my emphasis). So, what kinds of people would ‘have been better advised not to go to university’? Denham is silent on this. I would imagine it would not be the sons and daughter of skilled and lower managerial workers whom he had in his sights as widening participation candidates a few days earlier. Part of the answer is clearly that: “There are certainly young people who currently go to university who would have been better off on an Advanced Apprenticeship. We have been in danger of making it sound as if university is the only real aspiration” (Denham in Turner, 2008a). Thus: Denham is balancing his 50% HE target against his 20% apprenticeship target and appears to be caught between conflicting targets. At least if more went onto the Advanced Apprenticeship they could be ‘caught later’ when they did their business-oriented degrees dominated by employers to meet his 40% ‘high skills in the workforce’ target. David Turner hints that another part of the answer might be the ‘over-education’ problem highlighted by Francis Green and Yu Zhu that was reported in the Financial Times last year. This is where ‘one in three UK graduates is in non-graduate work’ (Turner, 2008). Green and Zhu also found that: “…almost six in 10 art and design graduates were over-qualified for their occupations. Young people who have attended the less prestigious modern universities, which were polytechnics until 1992, are three times as likely to end up in non-graduate jobs as Oxbridge graduates. The wide variation in future earnings power has disillusioned some graduates” (Turner, 2008). The notion that graduates should have only ‘graduate jobs’ is a functional and technicist approach to higher education. It assumes there should be a ‘fit’ between the levels of skill and knowledge developed at university and labour market destinations for graduates. It further assumes that work preparation provides the principal rationale for university study. Yet both these assumptions could be challenged. The first three jobs I had after graduating were a temporary residential social worker, a production worker in an engineering factory and a toilet cleaner in a plastics factory. Hardly ‘graduate jobs’, yet I learnt a lot from all of them, especially in terms of respecting those in low paid and low status jobs. Working in the engineering factory inspired my later PhD research – on the recruitment of engineering apprentices. As I argued on the basis of this empirical work: ‘The will of the worker is crucial’ (Rikowski, 1990, p.11) – both in the recruitment process and in the labour process. It is their ‘willingness’, or otherwise, to accept the ‘educational exchange’ they have experienced (see Rikowski, 1990, p.10) that challenges the ‘university for the labour market’ conception of higher education. Denham suspects ‘over-education’ will lead to graduates in non-graduate jobs causing unrest in the workplace and being living reminders to friends, siblings and others that perhaps university might not ‘pay off’ after all. Finally, it could also be that Denham is concerned that his three targets will implode on the current recession as the ‘economy shuddered to a halt’ in the second quarter of 2008 (Cohen, Strauss and Guha, 2008). How will the new graduates that Denham seems to want find graduate-level jobs in a recession? Yet he plods on: “If you look at the university system as a whole, and the way it engages with employers, it needs to be closer, more intensive, and part of what university offers has got to be tailored for the needs of a very different group of students and the people who are be going to be paying for these courses” (John Denham, in Wintour, 2008, p.2). This is Denham’s justification for the 30,000 new university paces for ‘business-focussed’ degrees. Yet will UK companies want to part-finance such degrees during a recession that could go on for some years? How will UK business find places for increasing numbers of Advanced Apprenticeships that Denham presses on them? Confusion and Consistency No doubt Denham’s multi-target-driven HE policy is causing him to utter confused messages. But at least he is consistent in one respect in arguing that: “Expanding higher education is an economic imperative” (Denham, 2008b, p.2). In this he merely follows previous New Labour education ministers. However, his whole approach is based on reducing HE to labour power production. Notions of the intrinsic interest of studying a subject in depth, the pleasures of thinking, challenging the ideas of others, making a contribution to scholarship, self-development, community development and many other possible goals and purposes of university life get squeezed out of the discussion in Denham’s bleak HE ‘realism’. References Cohen, N., Strauss, D. & Guha, K. (2008) Economy grinds to a halt after 16 years, Financial Times, 23/24th August, p.1. Denham, J. (2008a) Speech on Widening Participation to the HEFCE Conference, Warwick University, 8th April, online at: http://www.dius.gov.uk/speeches/denham_HEFCE_080408.html Denham, J. (2008b) John Denham on why university participation should expand, The Times, 11th April, at TimesOnline: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article4507301.ece?openComment=true Rikowski, G. (1990) The Recruitment Process and Labour Power, unpublished manuscript, Division ofHumanities & Modern Languages, Epping Forest College, Loughton, Essex, July. Online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=Recruitment%20and%20Labour%20Power Strauss, D. (2008) Pressure on Bank grows as economy contracts, Financial Times, 23/24th August, p.3. Turner, D. (2008) Minister questions wisdom of university education, Financial Times, 11th August, p.2. Wintour, P. (2008) Business to fund 30,000 new places in university shake-up, The Guardian, 14th April, online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/apr/14/highereducation.uk1 Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||