Flow of Ideas: articles - Moneythought in Higher Education |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Moneythought in Higher EducationGlenn Rikowski, London, 15th October 2006 Introduction In a seminar a few days ago we discussed the aims and purposes of education. A couple of students argued that money was the main goal. They argued their case well. Some others argued that work preparation was the main aim of higher education. Fortunately, a fair number argued against these views, stressing self-development, intellectual development or that higher education was about the initiation of people into the culture of society – the great literature, scientific theories and so on. Yet it is hardly surprising that students are beginning to focus on the bottom line in their thinking regarding the aims and purposes of higher education. It’s not just that increased higher education fees are causing students to focus more on the financial consequences of getting a degree. Higher education managers are setting an ever worse example in this respect. They set the tone; and they are getting into the culture of money and moneythought with gusto. Moneythought is a very broad and general phenomenon infecting higher education in England today. Moneythought can be viewed as where ideas, intellectual activities or the practical and organisational features of higher education are incorporated within or subordinated to the function of money-making. Money becomes the judge and jury of activities within the academy. Bonus Culture, Bogus Culture Thus, given the increasing emphasis on generating new ‘income streams’, making the best financial deal possible in knowledge transfer, the frantic search for more (relatively lucrative) overseas students, making money out of patents and inventions and so on, then an emerging ‘bonus culture’ being developed by higher education managers for staff seems no big deal. Of course, developing bonus schemes for staff has losers as well as winners, as Phil Baty (2006) explains: “Corporate-style cash bonuses for top-performing academics and sanctions against underachievers are arriving in UK universities in a human resources revolution that will put the performance of academics under unprecedented scrutiny.” A Universities and Colleges Employers’ Association (UCEA) survey found that 77 percent of higher education institutions of the 129 surveyed were already introducing staff bonus schemes, noted Baty. He also reported that from the same survey only 6 percent had no intention of developing such a scheme. It looks like a new ‘carrot and stick’ approach is being developed by higher education managers, notes Baty. Now, if academics had discovered a new drug that would cure a specific form of cancer, after years of hard work and graft in the lab, maybe they might deserve a bonus of some kind. Or, if a team of Marxist social theorists and economists had drawn up, on the back of a massive consultation programme with revolutionaries, trade unions, activists and experts in the field, an imaginative and sound programme for the transition from capitalist to socialist society – then maybe they should be rewarded. After all, they would be benefiting the whole of mankind: not just those who get a particular form of cancer. Yet I doubt whether this latter example would cut much ice with higher education managers doling out bonuses, though the former might. The former would involve creating something that could be developed and sold on the market, from which universities, eager to get a bit of the action, could gain from. Whereas the latter would destroy markets if put into practice! On another level, what these kinds of payments by results (PBR) schemes are really about are controlling academics’ outputs in ways which maximise income. In this process, the ideas and intellectual endeavours of academics are cast at the door of Mammon! In particular, in the UK, higher education managers at the departmental level are into making sure that academic outputs of staff are aimed at and consonant with the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). For those not familiar with this, each individual (for the first time in this next round) and each department is ranked in terms of ‘research quality’, and research flows from government coffers to those who do particularly well in process. It’s very much giving to those that already have, of course. The usual suspects tend to do best in the RAE. The Degradation of Education Research From 1994 to 2001 I was a contract researcher in education. My job security depended on having education research grants to support my post. During that time I was on a series of contracts. The point I want to make is that this situation encouraged me to pursue education grants with great vigour – no matter what the aims, value or provenance of the research were. I had three kids in school at the time. I became a victim, though a knowing one (which caused psychological stress), of moneythought in terms of my work. What I particularly resented was how difficult it was to build on critical and theoretical insights. In particular, to build on my work in Marxist educational theory in terms of the research I was doing. There were a few overlaps, some data was useful, and towards the end of my time as a contract researcher I did gain from the experience. Working on Education Action Zone projects I did see how I could link up the empirical data from these with the notion of the capitalisation schools drawn from Marxist science. Money under Scrutiny Rather staff being under scrutiny and surveillance in higher education, money should be. What is required is a Marxist analysis of money and its existence in higher education. I have said this before in various talks I have given. A good place to start in this might be with the work of Michael Neary and Graham Taylor (1998) in Money and the Human Condition. Unfortunately, this book is only available in hardback, but what it does is show how money is infused into the fabric of our lives. So much so argue Neary and Taylor, that it is not just a phenomenon external to us. As they note: “In a society dominated by money, I am money. I am an embodied manifestation of money in all its contradictory manifestations” (p.128). It is this kind of starting point that is required for the critique of moneythought in all its manifestations in higher education today. References Baty, P. (2006) Bonus culture sweeps sector, Times Higher Education Supplement, 13th October, p.1. Neary, M. & Taylor, G. (1998) Money and the Human Condition, Basingstoke: Macmillan. Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||