Flow of Ideas: articles - Education for Debt |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Education for DebtGlenn Rikowski, London, 22nd January 2007 If you string together certain articles, in a particular way, from yesterday's Observer it is possible to come up with a particularly perturbing analysis. Lateral thinking, linking up diverse yet apparently related issues, is the key. First of all, I was struck by an article by Ruth Sunderland (2007) on student debt. Sunderland points out, alluding to the balmy days of the late-1960s and early-1970s, that: "The years between 18 and 30 are meant to be carefree, but a record number of young adults are full members of Club Debt. Young people are struggling with high levels of unsecured borrowings in the form of credit card bills and student loans, with nearly 9 per cent in the red by £15,000 or more. Debt is harder to bear for most youngsters because they are more likely to be single, to have relatively low earnings and to have accumulated very little in the way of assets." How could they have been expected to have accumulated assets if they have these debts? I leave that to Sunderland to ponder on. In the same article it is noted that rising house prices have meant a transfer of wealth to the old from the young. I can see this in relation to my own kids. My eldest boy tried to get a mortgage on a 1-bedroom flat about 18 months ago, after working hard as a gardener and saving hard too, but was turned down. He lives in London, see. Yet the price of my (very modest) house is rising, especially as I live near Stratford, the site of the 2012 Olympics with all the investment (including transport infrastructure) that is going on. I remember that when the fire fighters strike was on a few years ago, and talking to them on picket lines in London, it transpired that many of them lived miles away. They couldn't afford London house prices. But the problem of rising house prices for young people is not just confined to those living in London. It is a national issue: "New figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders show that young people face bigger problems buying a home than any previous generation. The amount first-timers borrow has risen to 3.29 times their average household incomes, double the low of 1.7 times in 1980" (Sunderland, 2007). This can be seen as part of a general monetary assault on young people by what I have called the 'B Generation', the Bastard Generation (see Rikowski, 2001). In so many ways, my generation, the generation of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have made life difficult for young people in contemporary England. No more is this the case than with higher education fees. Of course, insult is added to injury with Gordon Brown's Child Trust Funds. The New Labour Government provides young people with a paltry sum (maximum £1,200, including top-ups from parents and grandparents) to fork out on higher education fees later on in their lives. But, as Jill Insley makes clear, this is next to nothing when set against the following considerations: "Last week universities warned that tuition fees would have to rise up to £10,000 a year from 2009, and the average deposit put down by a first-time buyer is now about £13,000 (nearer £25,000 in London)" (Insley, 2007). This is all of a piece with the call for a greater emphasis on 'financial literacy' for school students over the last five years or so. Thus, whilst New Labour hammers young people financially on so many fronts (carrying on where the Conservatives left off in 1997), it also argues (via the Department for Education and Skills and its co-conspirators in the Confederation of British Industry) that young people need to know more about how to manage their own (increasingly inadequate) financial resources. Insult added to injury. Of course, there is an argument that school children should know about how finance capital and its various appendages actually work. Trenchant critiques of the banking sector (and its stratospheric profits), why city slickers get mega bonuses, the withdrawal of state benefits from young people, the higher education fees regime and much else financial would be all to the good. Yet this is not what New Labour actually wants. The New Labourite debt-mongers want compliance and fear. They want to increase not lessen the burden of debt, and make us feel guilty in the process. This can be seen in the way that the leading banks are allowed to give further loans to those who can't meet existing payments (see MacErlean, 2007). It can also be seen in the 'expansion by stealth' of new gambling casinos (see Barnett, 2007). Add all this to the continued exposure of the National Lottery (now called Lotto, I believe) and it seems that the yuppie saying of the 1990s "greed is good" has been changed and generalised on a massive scale to: "debt is good". As Werner Bonefeld (1995) indicated nearly 12 years ago, the UK government (for Conservative and New Labour administrations) has embarked on a strategy of debt dependency for its subjects (as opposed to citizens). What this means is that the UK government has enhanced the power of money in our everyday lives, and members of the younger generation feel this frenzy, this intense penetration of money into their everyday lives more than others. It is a deliberate policy; debt addicts are necessary, it seems. Economic health appears to depend on our over-spending. But there is far more to it than this. The debt parasites, the 'debt solution' companies that advertise on commercial radio, pick on our debt bones as we struggle to financially rejuvenate. Debt nurtures our dependency on money; it sucks out our capacity to fight, to be obdurate, and to forge solidarity. It atomises, individualises and bathes our souls in guilt and despair. Debt debilitates, dampens anti-capitalist action and induces conformity and compliance on the foundation of the 'logic' of the politics of money. It causes social division (Bonefeld, 1995, pp.70-72). Yet this 'logic' can never be of cast iron. Possibilities for breaking through the wall of atomisation caused by debt are always immanent. We can revolt against being messed up by the contradiction entailed by the UK government's desire to have us resolve our role conflict as 'responsible citizen' and as 'debtor'. This living contradiction is summed-up neatly by Bonefeld: "Compliance with harsh conditions, espousal of the ethics of hard labour and the acceptance of the rule of money, is endorsed as the citizens' duty. The republic of debt is thus seen as the framework within which the rights of citizens subsist. Within this context, the role of the state is to preserve justice, that is, to impose upon social relations the conditions of their existence, that is, the free and equal citizen who recognises the duty and responsibility entrusted upon it by virtue of their ownership, including the ownership of labour power" (1995, p.87). Thus, education for debt implies an education that seeks to produce the kind of citizen outlined by Bonefeld above. Through this education, the type of citizen it attempts to generate is a pretty hopeless creature; pliable, fearful, lacking dignity yet manifesting a superficial upbeat and ever falsely hopeful mien. This damned education is a curse against which we must struggle. It aims to bind us to the power of money and the fickleness and mendacity of capital movements, and to the vicious decisions of human representatives of capital. It is an anti-education of progress; it negates human progress and hope. Addendum: 22nd January 2007 An article in The Times today (Heywood, 2007) reported that a 'flat' sized 12ft by 6th was for sale in Chelsea, west London for £170,000. To make it habitable would cost another £30,000. The 'flat' is so small that you could literally 'not swing a cat in it', notes Heywood. The flat was formerly a cleaners' cupboard! References Barnett, A. (2007) Revealed: march of the new casinos, The Observer, 21st January, p.1. Bonefeld, W. (1995) The Politics of Debt: Social Discipline and Control, Common Sense: Journal of the Conference of Socialist Economists, No.17, pp.69-91. Heywood, J. (2007) No room to swing a cat (or a cue) in the 12ft x 6ft flat for sale at £170,000, The Times, 22nd January, p.3. Insley, J. (2007) A little trust goes a long way for children, The Observer (Business and Media), 21st January, p.12. MacErlean, N. (2007) Can't meet the payments, sir? No problem we'll just lend you more, The Observer (Business and Media), 21st January, p.11. Rikowski, G. (2001) The B Generation, written for and distributed at the May Day Monopoly events in central London, 1st May, online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=B%20Generation Sunderland, R. (2007) Out of university and straight into Club Debt, The Observer (Business and Media), 21st January, p.1. Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||