Flow of Ideas: articles - Edison Schools in the UK |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Edison Schools in the UKGlenn Rikowski, London, 23rd April 2007 Nine years ago, Francis Beckett warned teachers and all those interested in defending state education in the UK that an American company, Edison Schools, was having talks with the New Labour government regarding running state schools on contract for profit (see Beckett, 1998). David Blunkett, then New Labour Education Secretary, was at least considering the idea. But nothing came of it, immediately. Following struggles to turn a profit with its US schools contracts (it took the company 11 years to generate profits) and after a US Federal investigation into some of its operations, Edison Schools persisted in its ambitions to penetrate the UK schools market. For the last five years it has had an office in the UK (Marley, 2007), and has been involved in 50 consultancies for primary, second and special schools (Ibid,). However, Edison was failing to run whole schools in the UK, until now. At last, in the dog days of the Blair regime, Edison's dreams of a significant UK foothold in the schools sector have come true. Last Friday, it emerged in the educational press that Edison would run Salisbury School, in Edmonton, in the London Borough of Enfield. The contract was to be £1million for three years, and Edison would only get the full amount if it delivered on better results, fewer exclusions and increased parental approval of the school's functioning (Meikle, 2007). As James Meikle notes: "An American-owned education company is to take over the senior management of a London comprehensive school in what is thought to be the first case of its kind for a local authority school" (Ibid.). Alex Stephens in today's London Evening Standard called it 'an unprecedented move'. What is significant here is that Edison is only taking over the senior management of the school and not drafting in its own teachers, or teachers trained by the company. Thus, it is basically playing an educational management organisation (EMO) role at the school (as opposed to the local authority) level. There's a 'failsafe' in this deal: should Edison Schools not reach its targets it can always argue that it was not given sufficient control over frontline teaching staff. What, if anything is so special about this Edison Schools deal? Probably two aspects make it an 'unprecedented move'. First, it appears that this is an extension of New Labour's policy on failing schools. The most controversial feature of the government's policy on failing schools to date has been to close them down and replace them with Academies (though it has tried other strategies too). However, New Labour is finding this strategy difficult of late. On the one hand, it has had to face increasingly effective local campaigns to stop Academies being built. On the other, it is having trouble finding sponsors for Academies (who need to cough up anything up to £2million) in the light of the ongoing 'honours-for-cash' scandal, where some sponsors of Academies have allegedly been awarded honours for participating in the programme. The recent publication of Francis Beckett's groundbreaking book (Beckett, 2007) on Academies may also have caused a few jitters amongst some key players in the Department for Education and Skills. Perhaps an alternative was required. Secondly, and most obviously, Edison Schools is an American company. Wholly foreign companies have not to date run frontline teaching services in the UK, though foreign companies and multinationals do have parts to play in the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), where school building and refurbishment programmes are involved. But why let an American, or any foreign company, penetrate the fledgling UK educational services market if the aim is to build up indigenous companies as potential export earners in schools markets? As I have argued elsewhere (Rikowski, 2007), one of the reasons New Labour has opened up the schools sector to companies through outsourcing is that it seeks to nurture home-grown operators in this field who can then go out and earn vital export earnings by becoming international players in the global schools market. New Labour has gone about this very slowly – too slowly for companies wanting substantial chunks of the schools' sector outsourced – yet strategically. Edison Schools has been courting New Labour for penetrating the UK schools sector for around 10 years, and has been continually brushed: until now. So, what has changed? This is difficult to say. Perhaps New Labour is using Edison Schools as a battering ram to open up the school improvement industry to private operators on a significantly larger scale. If the scheme to improve the Salisbury School works (or, more importantly, it appears that it works) then UK companies could charge into the breach. On the other hand, perhaps Edison Schools was prepared to dredge up the World Trade Organisation's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) for the UK government's persistence in ignoring the company for substantial schools contracts: the spectre of 'unfair trade' in educational services was maybe looming over Alan Johnson, the UK Education Secretary. Whatever the origins of and rationale behind the deal, it is dispiriting seeing the response of Peter Lewis, Enfield's Director of Education, Children's Services & Leisure. He says: "I'm delighted to be embarking on this ground-breaking initiative which brings the best of local authority practice together with the open market. This is a real opportunity to deliver a new school improvement approach that has the needs of the students at its core" (in Stephens, 2007). And the new head teacher at the Salisbury School, Trevor Averre-Beeson added that: "Edison's sensible and practical programme will help the school put in place the framework for further improvements, with an emphasis on providing a positive learning environment, continuing professional development for staff, creating a strong ethos of personal responsibility and self-discipline, and an effective support network for students and their families" (Ibid.). However, Alex Stephens (2007) noted that the Salisbury School had come out of "special measures" in 2003. It has made some improvement since. In the light of this, Steve Sinnott, General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, has suggested that rather than lining Edison's pockets the money would be better spent if it went directly into improving the school (in Meikle, 2007). For those who have not heard of Edison Schools before, or who might hold that the company can bring nothing but good to Salisbury School, and perhaps eventually other schools in the UK, then I would suggest that they read Kenneth Saltman's excellent book, The Edison Schools (Saltman, 2005). Saltman not only brings Edison's effectiveness to turn around schools and its probity into question, but also alerts us to the dangers such operators pose to the development of democracy: "Challenges to Edison and public school privatization more generally must go beyond criticisms based in effective delivery of instruction measured by test scores. It must begin to address the dangers posed to the promise of a democratic society of the unchecked expansion of corporate power and the infiltration of public schools as a crucial place for the development of a more genuinely democratic society" (p.206). Technicist critiques of Edison and their ilk are insufficient. We need to view them in the context of what sort of society we need and want. References Beckett, F. (1998) Uncle Sam wants your school, New Statesman, 21st August, pp.16-17. Beckett, F. (2007) The Great City Academy Fraud, London: Continuum. Marley, D. (2007) US firm takes over in £1m deal, Times Educational Supplement, 20th April, p.3. Meikle, J. (2007) US firm to take over London local authority school, The Guardian, 23rd April, p.7, and online at: http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,2063219,00.html Murphy, J. (2007) US firm to take over north London school, London Evening Standard, 23rd April, p.20. Rikowski, G. (2007) The Profit Virus: The Business Takeover of Schools, 19th February, London, online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=The%20Profit%20Virus%20-%20The%20Business%20Takeover%20of%20Schools Saltman, K. (2005) The Edison Schools: Corporate Schooling and the Assault on Public Education, New York & London: Routledge. Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||