Flow of Ideas: articles - Critical Mass |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Critical MassPhil Badger, Lecturer in Philosophy & Sociology, Philosophy Co-ordinator, Epping Forest College Glenn Rikowski, Research Fellow, School of Education, University of Birmingham 6th December 1996 The kids, it seems, are on the rampage, out of control – in serious need of moral re-direction. But when people talk of the moral decline of society, of young people out of control and of the need for moral education to set things right, we have a duty to ask what they see as the form and content of such education. We may suspect that some, although not all, of the more reactionary supporters of moral education mean something akin to moral drilling sessions with teachers taking the role of ethical sergeant-majors and children endlessly repeating or writing out phrases such as “Thou shalt not steal”. Obviously, this image is extreme and only the most unreflective and ignorant apostles of “morality” in education would advocate such a practice, but it is less the promoters of moral education and more the less critical elements of their audience with whom we need to be concerned. We may suggest that “moral drill” will be ineffective just as the rote-learning of other subject matter often is because it is forgotten outside the classroom door or the school gate. Yet if we are ourselves challenged to say what form moral education should take then we may suspect that the moral drill brigade will be alarmed by our inevitably liberal answer. Moral education, if it is to have any effect, must encourage children to assess values and to internalise them or not on the basis of that assessment. Young people need to claim ownership of values for themselves, and this means turning moral issues into a practical subject which asks them to confront the complexities of moral issues armed with their intellect and the task of trying to do the right thing. This approach would no doubt cause consternation to certain parts of the political Right because it questions the notion that morality is a series of commandments carved in stone and suggests that a questioning attitude is itself desirable. Such liberal ideas may be castigated by some as not being part of the answer to the problems we face but the cause of them. Liberalism, it will be argued, is fatally allied to moral scepticism and relativism and, as such, is the enemy of social peace and moral consensus. Such a reaction is however fallacious. In truth, the conservative reaction to the liberal case is borne of the ultimate belief that, as Samuel Butler put it: “The foundations of morality are like all other foundations: if you dig too much about them the superstructure comes tumbling down”. The conservative instinct is that giving rational grounds for our values is impossible, and that therefore to attempt to explore our values is folly. Tradition and its unquestioned acceptance are the bedrock of a stable society from the conservative viewpoint. The problem with this is that while such a position may be satisfactory in a society in which the pace of social change is slow, and social mobility is severely constricted, it is not credible in the laissez-faire cultural melting-pot in which we now live. The whole context of advanced industrial society in its Anglo-American form is ruthlessly individualistic and engenders anti-traditionalist values which undermine notions of “community” and settled values. In this situation, the heady mixture of free market economics and social traditionalism which we associate with modern British Conservatism is bound by its incompatible ingredients to curdle horribly. The alternative – for contrary to infamous assertion there is one – is to embrace a liberal rather than a conservative model of values and to further acknowledge that it is the Right who suffer most from moral scepticism in their reluctance to “dig around in the foundations of morality” for fear that we will discover that the whole house is built on sand. ‘Liberalism’, of course, is a very broad church. There are some pews we would not wish to sit on. Certain species of liberalism, especially those varieties which cling to notions of ‘market freedom’ and the privatisation of public goods, are wholly deficient as tools for framing a new moral discourse for education. At best, such liberalisms result in taking the rising academic subject of ‘business ethics’ seriously. At worst, they cultivate forms of ‘market nihilism’ (where the only ‘values’ are those resting on Money and market advantage), the celebration of greed or the cynical moralisation of economic advantage and privilege. We would advocate a liberal analysis of the place of moral debate within the classroom which would not stop when it encountered entrenched economic and social interests. In the end, the problem of order in our present situation is not one that we can solve by introducing the odd lesson on civics or the like, but it is one which may be partially addressed by giving a central place to moral education within the curriculum in compulsory schooling and 16-19 education and training. However, there are evident problems with the sort of top-down approach as developed by the National Forum for Values of the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA). The ‘shared moral values’ outlined by SCAA – in the areas of society, relationships, the self and the environment – must be critically assessed and appropriated by young people themselves if they are to gain ‘ownership’ of these values. The application of SCAA’s New Moral Commandments for young people requires then to think about the economic, social and political environment they live in if they are to make informed moral decisions. Young people also need to handle the difficult issues surrounding the clash of moral principles – and SCAA’s list of moral values readily suggests possible sources of moral dilemma and contradiction. To be fair to SCAA and the Values Forum – and particularly to Nick Tate, its Chief Executive – they have realised that moral education alone is not enough. Tate’s advocacy of a Critical Thinking A-level is in line with our escape route out of the moral educational maze. Moral education, then, needs to be supplemented by two additional educational inputs: critical thinking skills and a renewal of social studies in the curriculum. The former is essential for analysing moral dilemmas and conundrums thrown up by everyday life. Some leading employers support the development of critical thinking education on this score. Social studies would provide students with an understanding of the context in which moral principles relate to moral behaviour and actions. There are problems with this line of thought. First, on critical thinking, cadres within the Conservative Party and the educational Right brigade would wish to place substantial caveats around the notion of ‘thinking’ (keep it safe, constrained and bounded by the ‘higher’ values of family and nation) and would balk at anything ‘critical’ (thou should be uncritical of British economic and social arrangements). Secondly, social studies and critical analysis have been on the run – especially in post-compulsory education and training – for the last twenty years. There is no sign that this trend will be reversed. These retro features of the British educational landscape point towards the need to view the whole ‘moral education debate’ more broadly in terms of political economy. As we see it, the issues at stake are wider and more fundamental than have been acknowledged thus far and connect to our future success as a society in both social and economic terms. British society, as Will Hutton has argued, is mired in the inadequacies of its own political economy and the roots of that inadequacy lie in the exclusion, either voluntary or compulsory, of so many of our citizens from political and economic life. The existence of a large group of individuals who see themselves as politically powerless and socially and economically helpless is potentially disastrous in a whole range of ways. Politics may be too important to be left to politicians but the average young citizen feels that he or she has nothing or little to say to them or vice versa. The standard of political debate reveals contempt for the intelligence of the population and the media’s endless search for the sound-bite makes sustained argument almost impossible. In such a context, it is all the more important that we develop the critical faculties of our young people so that we begin to demand and deserve better from those who lead us. Recent results from projects promoting accelerated cognitive development through a problem-solving approach to science topics show that the development of thinking skills in one area can and does spill over into an enhanced performance in others. We may suspect that this would be the case with critical thinking skills, which are anyway the foundation of success in so many traditional academic subjects. The problems that face us are not to be laid at the door of education alone, as has been attempted by various governments over the last twenty years in relation to the so-called “skills deficit”, but should properly be seen as systemic. It is no good us developing critical thinking for citizenship if our political and social frameworks do not admit of the activities of citizenship. What is needed is a movement towards an educational future in which moral education, critical thinking in education (and beyond the school gate) and, finally, a renaissance in social studies teaching and learning are key driving forces. Such an approach would be part of a more general programme of moral and political renewal which transcends both ‘traditional’ and ‘market’ forms of moral discourse. Neither should we distribute these educational goodies only to those doing A-levels. We are in need of a critical mass rather than an enlightened few. Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||