Flow of Ideas: articles - Bourdieu on Social Capital |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Forms of Capital: Critique of Bourdieu on Social CapitalGlenn Rikowski, London, 15th April 2008 Introduction This is the third in a series of articles critiquing Pierre Bourdieu’s uses of the concept of capital. The first article (Rikowski, 2007) focused on problems in Bourdieu’s conception of capital. The second one explored his notion of ‘cultural capital’ (Rikowski, 2008). This third article examines Bourdieu (1997) on ‘social capital’. Bourdieu on Social Capital Compared with his outlines of capital and cultural capital, Bourdieu’s definition of social capital is straightforward: “Social capital is the aggregate of the actual or potential resources which are linked to possession of a durable network of more or less institutionalized relationships of mutual acquaintance and recognition – or in other words, to membership of a group – which provides each of its members with the backing of the collectively-owned capital, a ‘credential’ which entitles them to credit, in the various senses of the word” (Bourdieu, 1997, p.51). Social capital appears to be about the resources inhering in social networks that individuals are engaged with, and which can be mobilized by them for their own ends. Hence: “The volume of the social capital possessed by a given agent … depends on the size of the network of connections he can effectively mobilize and on the volume of the capital (economic, cultural or symbolic) possessed in his own right by each of those to whom he is connected” (Ibid.). Bourdieu explains (in 1997) that an individual’s ability to cash in on the social networks s/he is involved with is a function of their own economic capital, their place in the social hierarchy and the power this bestows on them, and their social status. Yet individuals must strive hard to maintain their influence in the social networks they can draw on to realize their goals. They have to work at it notes Bourdieu, as: “The reproduction of social capital presupposes an unceasing effort of sociability, continuous series of exchanges in which recognition is endlessly affirmed and reaffirmed” (1997, p.52). It is a lifetime’s job, this sociability; individuals need to ensure that the reciprocity in their interactions with others within their social networks is continually nurtured to maintain their social capital, and to extend these efforts in order to increase it. A World of Capital Given Bourdieu’s notion of social capital, we inhabit a “world of capital”. All our social relationships, including our virtual e-relationships through having MySpace etc. ‘friends’, are manifestations of social capital. Contemporary social institutions, organizations and groups are repositories of and resources for social capital. There is no escape from ‘capital’ in Bourdieu’s social universe. I agree with him, we cannot ‘escape’ capital; though I have a very different conception of the social universe of capital (in Rikowski, 2002 and 2005) to Bourdieu’s. For me, the social universe of capital incorporates, and is constituted by, opposition between labour and capital. Through labour workers create capital, and mediate and facilitate all of its transformations from surplus-value (its first form) into money, state etc., just as capital then oppresses and dominates labour and labourers. Bourdieu’s concept of capital appears to lack this dynamic; the labour-capital relation. The consequence of this is that capital dominates social life completely. There is no openness in the global social system as all is capital, and labour can only ever maintain and expand capital. In terms of his practical politics and the books he wrote towards the end of his life, especially Acts of Resistance (Bourdieu, 1998), Bourdieu celebrated examples of labour resisting capital and the practical consequences of governments acting on its ideology of neoliberalism. Bourdieu’s late political writings appear to contradict his Borg-like conception of capital as ‘all that there is’ in contemporary social life, where all struggles are reduced to that between individuals and groups as forms of capital. Furthermore, as Blunden (2004) notes, what is required in order to ground social capital, cultural capital and other forms non-economic capital as forms of capital, is that it must be indicated how: “…they can be converted into “economic capital”, and thus that everything deemed to be a form of capital can be arranged, under some condition, along a single axis, i.e. quantified” (Part II, p.21 – my emphasis). How ‘much’ social capital is needed to produce X economic capital? Bourdieu (1997) has a section on ‘Conversions’ where he addresses the issue of converting one form of capital into another. When examining the conversion of economic capital into other forms he notes that: “The different types of capital can be derived from economic capital, but only at a cost of a more or less great effort of transformation, which is needed to produce the type of power effective in the field in question” (pp.53-43). Hence, the conversion (of economic capital into other forms) appears to be determined by effort and application (labour) on the part of individuals. Bourdieu argues that ‘economic capital is at the root of all the other types of capital’, even as the other forms of capital, including social capital ‘conceal … the fact that economic capital is at their root’ (1997, p.54). Blunden (2004, Part II, pp.21-22) argues that Bourdieu does not provide the principle through which one form of capital is converted into another in his book Distinction (Bourdieu, 1984). From what Blunden says about Bourdieu’s concept of capital in Distinction, convertibility is a question of struggle and power. It is these that determine the degree of capital X required to attain a particular amount of capital Y. This seems unfair on Bourdieu. In his The Forms of Capital paper, Bourdieu does provide a convertibility principle (p.54): labour-time. For: “The universal equivalent, the measure of all equivalences, is nothing other than labor-time (in the widest sense); and the conservation of social energy through all its conversions is verified if, in each case, when one takes into account both the labor-time accumulated in the form of capital and the labor-time needed to transform it from one type into another” (1997, p.54). At this point, Bourdieu reaches for another concept foundational to Karl Marx’s critique of political economy: labour-time. For Marx, the socially necessary labour-time that went into the production of a commodity determines its value. For Bourdieu, however, it is actual labour-time that is the measure of equivalence of forms of capital. Thus, Bourdieu not only rips the concept of labour-time out of the production of commodities in the labour process, but extends it; just as he extended the concept of capital itself (to social capital and other forms). Generalised and extended in this form, and allied to a concept of social capital that includes all social relations and relationships, Bourdieu’s principle of labour-time being the basis of convertibility of forms of capital appears to make it impossible to distinguish between types of society, as Blunden (2004) argues. His concept of capital, together with its forms, and his principle of convert ability, could as well be applied to Feudalism as capitalism. This consideration makes Bourdieu’s concepts of capital (including social capital) incoherent: social capital is possible in non-capitalist societies! References Blunden, A. (2004) Social solidarity versus “Social Capital”, a paper in three parts, at the Ethical Politics Home Page: http://ethicalpolitics.org/reviews/social-solidarity.htm Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Bourdieu, P. (1997) The Forms of Capital, in: A. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.) Education: Culture, Economy and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time, Cambridge: Polity Press. Rikowski, G. (2002) Education, Capital and the Transhuman, in: D. Hill, P. McLaren, M. Cole & G. Rikowski (Eds.) Marxism Against Postmodernism in Educational Theory, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Rikowski, G. (2005) Distillation: Education in Karl Marx’s Social Universe, a paper presented at the Lunchtime Seminar, School of Education, University of East London, Barking Campus, 14th February, online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=Distillation Rikowski, G. (2007) Forms of Capital: Critique of Bourdieu on Capital, 18th December, London, online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=Bourdieu%20on%20Capital Rikowski, G. (2008) Forms of Capital: Critique of Bourdieu on Cultural Capital, 6th January, London, online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=Bourdieu%20on%20Cultural%20Capital Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||