Flow of Ideas: articles - Ambassadors of Capital in Schools |
||||||||||||||||||
A Capital Friendly Culture for Further Education Academy Chains After the Hillcole Group Against What We Are Worth Ambassadors of Capital in Schools An Educational Mansion House for Business Apprenticeship and the Use-value Aspect of Labour Power Artistic Outlook Ayers Rocked In His Own Universe B Generation Bourdieu on Capital Bourdieu on Cultural Capital Bourdieu on Social Capital Brown PFI Monster Business Sponsorship of Schools Business Takeover of Further Education Cambridge University Occupation Caught in the Storm of Capital Co-payment in Hospitals and Schools Cold Hands and Quarter Moon Communitarianism for Schools Compulsory Consumption and Uni-Nanny Conforming Schools Conforming Kids Copy/South Dossier Creating Monsters Creeping Privatisation in Higher Education Critical Mass Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism Critical Space in Education Delivering E-Learning Digital Rights Management Distillation Dorothy L. Sayers Douglas Kennedy: best-selling novelist E-learning for Free at the BBC Edison Schools in the UK Education and Inspections Bill (2006) Education As Culture Machine Education Fireworks Education for Debt Education Incorporated Education Markets and Missing Products Education Repetition Education the HSBC Way Education White Paper Education, Globalisation and the Learning Society Employers and School Leavers Evaluating Different Teaching Methods Everything Louder Than Everything Else Finance and Fear Five Endings of Desires Foibles, Frolics and Phantasms Freedom Freewill French New Wave Cinema Full Report Ruth Rikowski's Book Launch for Globalisation, Information and Libraries Gender and Spokesperson in Group Work Issues Global Trading Globalisation and Education Revisited Habituation of the Nation Higher Education and Confused Employer Syndrome Hitchcock: classic auteur Human capital, the knowledge economy and business In Retro Glide In the Dentist's Chair Kids in the Land of No Dreams KM Critique Lazy Brit Kids Learning in the Earthworks of Capital Learning Investments Learning to the Max Librarianship and Human Rights Lifelong Learning and the Political Economy of Containment LSBU Strategy Marketisation of the Schools System in England Marx and Education Revisited Marx and the Future of the Human Marxism and Education Revisited Marxist Educational Theory Unplugged Maturity and Freedom McDonaldization and Education Michael Jackson Michele Roberts Miss Allison and Novel Writing Moneythought in Higher Education Mrs Thatcher and Holes in the Kitchen Floor Multiculturalism and Faith Schools My Tony Blair New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 1 New Ideas in Ruth Rikowski's Book - Part 2 New Labour Policy for Schools Nietzsche's School Nihilism and Educational Values No Learner Left Unhassled Notes on the Confessions of John Denham On Education for Its Own Sake On Education Studies On the Capitalisation of Schools in England On Transhumanism and Education Open Access Outsourcing Public Services Peter Wilby on School Privatisation Planet of the Capitorg Plato Playgound Risks and Handcuffed Kids Poems by Gregory Rikowski Poems by Victor Rikowski Post-Fordism and Schools Post-Fordism in Primary Schools Postmodern Dereliction in the Face of Neoliberal Education Policy PowerPointlessness in Higher Education Private Schools as Charities Privatisation of Schools in England Privatisation of Student Debt Races in the Imperial War Readings for Teaching Course Recruitment and Labour Power Revealed Recruitment Criteria through the Use-value Aspect of Labour-power Robotic Ethics Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) Ruth Rikowski Updates (Archives) School Fees and the 1944 Education Act Schools: Building for Business Science Fiction Films and Horror Second Time as Farce Snowballs and Risk in Schools Social Contract Theory and Political Obligations Socialism is not Dead Speed of Life - Part One Speed of Life - Part Two Stroppy Individuals and Oppositional Cultures in Schools Sustainability Policy at London South Bank University Ten Points on Marx, Class and Education The Business of Becoming a Business for Academies The Capitalisation of Schools - Federations and Academies The CBI and the Business Takeover of Schools The Commodification of Education The Education White Paper and the Marketisation of Schools The Evolution of Federations of Schools The Last Parents Evening The New Japanisation of Schools The Profit Virus - The Business Takeover of Schools The Standards Language-game for Schools in England The Which Blair Project Three Types of Apprenticeship - Three Forms of Mastery Tony and Caroline Benn Tony Benn: Letters to Grandchildren Transport Turney's and PPU Uninspiring Towers Universe of Capital and My Space Universities in a Neoliberal World Utopia and Education What Can Nietzsche Teach Ya When Bullies Roam the School When the Bowers Break Why Employers Can't Ever Get What They Want Will Hutton and His E-Foss Wolf on Marx Without Sparks Women in World Wars
| Ambassadors of Capital: Business Leaders as Head TeachersGlenn Rikowski, London, 19th August 2007 Introduction There is a recruitment crisis for head teachers for schools in England. In the next five years, 37% of head teachers will retire, and deputy heads ‘don’t want to be head teachers’, according to Curtis (2007). Higher pay for head teachers to attract more recruits has been ruled out by the government (Milne, 2007a, p.7). For New Labour, this is viewed as both a problem and an opportunity. A report published earlier this year (DfES & PWC, 2007) saw this situation as where the influence of business values and business folk could be extended further still in the schools system: “Businesspeople with no classroom experience should run schools to help tackle the head teacher recruitment crisis, a report to the government is expected to recommend today” (Boone, 2007). It did indeed recommend this: ‘ambassadors of capital’ were given encouragement to lead schools by the mighty PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) – pedagogues of schooling for capital. Ambassadors of Capital The PWC report argued for ‘…extending the provision of training and licensing to leaders who do not have Qualified Teacher Status (QTS)’ (DfES & PWC, 2007, p.xii). The Department for Education and Skills (DfES) put it a little more subtly as being about: “…removing barriers that may prevent a wider range of professionals with the relevant skills becoming school leaders, although there must always be a head of teaching and learning who is a qualified teacher” (DfES, 2007, p.1). Thus, although the new business heads have overall control there should be a deputy head of teaching and learning, implying a division of labour. Meikle (2007) also pointed to the complexities of modern school organisation, which involves skills in accounting, human resources and estate management – as well as in pedagogy – as grounding PWC’s argument for head teachers schooled in the business of life and the life of business. Having business leaders without QTS running schools is controversial. Milne noted that a ‘hearts and minds marketing campaign’ would be needed to ‘win support for the changes’ (2007b). Steve Sinnott, General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, argued that the primary purpose of schools is to ‘educate pupils, not to be commercial organisations’ (in Hayes, 2007). The teacher unions will need some convincing. Part of the government’s strategy for changing perceptions and attitudes is the Future Leaders Programme, where dynamic folk are ‘intensively groomed’ to become heads in inner-London schools (Milne, 2007b). The first intake of 20 included people who had worked in the fashion, marketing and tourist industries (Ibid.). Milne (2007c) gives some case studies regarding these want-to-be heads, though he indicates that the person who was probably the first to get such a headship got a ‘hostile reception from teachers’. Another aspect of the Future Teachers Programme is that business leaders are being asked to part with hard cash to pay 50 per cent of the salaries of these ‘ambassadors of capital’. Indeed, candidates: “…from the Future Leaders programme were fêted at 10 Downing Street on Monday, as business leaders were encouraged to pay half the salaries of the trainee heads” (Milne, 2007a, p.6). The role of the ‘ambassadors of capital’ is not just to inject business values into schools. They have a wider significance in being tied up with New Labour’s policy on federations of schools. With luck, they will become Federation Starship Captains as well as Ambassadors of Capital. Federation Starship Captains I have noted elsewhere (in Rikowski, 2005) the significance of federations of schools for New Labour’s stealthy approach to the business takeover of schools. In particular, federations offer economies of scale when headed by companies running them on a contract for profit. But first they have to be established and made hospitable to business interest and values. We can expect a lengthy softening-up process. Michael Barber has been a key player in smoothing the way for federations and ‘distributed leadership’ in the schools system. He argued a few months before the PWC report came out that: “The health and education reforms are at a crucial stage of transition away from command and control and this requires sophisticated strategic leadership” (Barber, 2006). The PWC report considered a range of leadership models, and: “…recommends that schools consider new types of leadership: a federated model brings groups of schools under one “super-head”…” (Frean, 2007). The federated model came out particularly well, as: “…this model can be shown to have a number of key benefits which, ultimately, impact positively on pupil performance, for example: greater capacity through more distributed leadership; economies of scale achieved through pooling resources; smoother transitions of pupils between phases; and improved progression opportunities for all members of the workforce” (DfES & PWC, 2007, p.xi – my emphasis). In addition: “The structure of governing bodies should also be changed, the report says, suggesting the creation of “meta-governors” working across a number of schools in a locality” (Frean, 2007). Putting together the pieces of the jigsaw, the picture becomes clear: the door is open for business folk without QTS to become ambassadors of capital across a federation. In theory within the new federated model they could be supported by a team of “meta-governors” across the federation. Conclusion The final part of the jigsaw would involve allowing companies to run federations on a contract for profit, to appoint their own head (without QTS, no doubt) and to fix the governing bodies (as in Academies). But the full picture seems some way off at present. New Labour is moving slowly, and trying not to alarm teachers and their unions. Whether the full jigsaw is ever completed will be up to the forces of labour in the schools system. The first two stages are well under way though. Ambassadors of capital will play a preparatory role, and federations are increasingly being bulldozed through – often against the wishes of parents as well as teachers. Those ‘seeking an education that is free of capital’s fetters face growing challenges’ (Rikowski, 2004), and one of these is to ensure that ambassadors of capital do not become federation starship captains hired by corporations to run schools on contracted basis for profit. References Barber, M. (2006) Reform of our public services is a test for managers, Financial Times, 27th September, p.17. Boone, J. (2007) Call for corporate approach to schools crisis, Financial Times, 18th January, p.7. Curtis, P. (2007) Preparing for power, The Guardian (Education), 2nd January, p.1. DfES (2005) A New Approach to School Leadership: Independent Report, Press Notice 2007/0011, Department for Education and Skills, 18th January: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi?pn_id=2007_0011 DfES & PWC (2007) Independent Study into School Leadership – Main Report, Department for Education and Skills and PricewaterhouseCoopers, January, RB818A, Nottingham: DfES Publications. Frean, A. (2007) Chief executives with no teaching experience could take over schools, The Times, 19th January, p.8. Hayes, D. (2007) School could be run by businessmen, London Evening Standard, 18th January, p.6. Kelly, J. (2002) Business people may run state school federations, Financial Times, 19th September, p.4. Meikle, J. (2007) Business leaders could become school heads, report suggests, The Guardian, 18th January, p.6. Milne, J. (2007a) Future leaders relish challenge, Times Educational Supplement, 19th January, pp.6-7. Milne, J. (2007b) Old-school heads will roll, Times Educational Supplement, 19th January, p.1. Milne, J. (2007c) Off with her headship, Times Educational Supplement, 2nd February, p.8. Rikowski, G. (2004) Marx and the Education of the Future, Policy Futures in Education, Vol.2 Nos. 3 & 4, pp.565-577, online at: http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/viewpdf.asp?j=pfie&vol=2&issue=3&year=2004&article=10_Rikowski_PFEO_2_3-4_web&id=195.93.21.71 Rikowski, G. (2005) Federation Starships? The Evolution of Federations of Schools in England, A Paper Presented at the Education Studies / Education Policy Research Seminar, University College Northampton, School of Education, Yelvertoft 209, 24th February. Online at: http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=The%20Evolution%20of%20Federations%20of%20Schools Print Friendly - Print Friendly with links |
|||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||